Without loss of generality, assume that
x1≤x2≤⋯≤xn. Thus,
min{x1,x2,…,xn}=x1 and
max{x1,x2,…,xn}=xn. 1. Max–QM
We want to prove that
xn≥nx12+x22+⋯+xn2. Since
x1≤xn,x2≤xn,…,xn−1≤xn, we have
x12≤xn2,x22≤xn2,…,xn−12≤xn2. Together with xn2=xn2, this gives
x12+x22+⋯+xn2≤nxn2. Dividing by n and taking square roots,
xn≥nx12+x22+⋯+xn2. 2. QM–AM
We want to prove that
nx12+x22+⋯+xn2≥nx1+x2+⋯+xn. Since
(x1−x2)2+(x1−x3)2+⋯+(xn−1−xn)2≥0, expanding all the squares gives
(n−1)(x12+x22+⋯+xn2)≥2x1x2+2x1x3+⋯+2xn−1xn. Adding
x12+x22+⋯+xn2 to both sides, we obtain
n(x12+x22+⋯+xn2)≥(x1+x2+⋯+xn)2. Dividing by n2,
nx12+x22+⋯+xn2≥(nx1+x2+⋯+xn)2. Taking square roots gives
nx12+x22+⋯+xn2≥nx1+x2+⋯+xn. 3. AM–GM
We prove
nx1+x2+⋯+xn≥nx1x2⋯xn by Cauchy's forward–backward induction.
Base case: n=2
We have
(x1−x2)2≥0. Therefore,
x1+x2≥2x1x2, and hence
2x1+x2≥x1x2. Thus, AM–GM holds for n=2.
Forward step: from n to 2n
Assume AM–GM holds for n positive real numbers.
Consider 2n positive real numbers
x1,x2,…,xn,xn+1,…,x2n. Divide them into two groups of n numbers. By the induction hypothesis,
nx1+x2+⋯+xn≥nx1x2⋯xn and
nxn+1+xn+2+⋯+x2n≥nxn+1xn+2⋯x2n. Therefore,
2nx1+x2+⋯+x2n=2nx1+⋯+xn+nxn+1+⋯+x2n≥2nx1x2⋯xn+nxn+1xn+2⋯x2n. Applying the two-variable AM–GM inequality,
2nx1+x2+⋯+x2n≥nx1x2⋯xnnxn+1xn+2⋯x2n=2nx1x2⋯x2n. Thus, if AM–GM holds for n, it also holds for 2n.
Backward step: from n to n−1
Assume AM–GM holds for n positive real numbers.
Let x1,x2,…,xn−1 be positive, and define
xn=n−1x1+x2+⋯+xn−1. Then
nx1+x2+⋯+xn−1+xn=xn. Applying AM–GM to the n numbers x1,x2,…,xn, we get
xn≥nx1x2⋯xn−1xn. Raising both sides to the n-th power,
xnn≥x1x2⋯xn−1xn. Since xn>0, divide by xn:
xnn−1≥x1x2⋯xn−1. Taking the (n−1)-st root gives
xn≥n−1x1x2⋯xn−1. Substituting the definition of xn,
n−1x1+x2+⋯+xn−1≥n−1x1x2⋯xn−1. Thus, if AM–GM holds for n, it also holds for n−1.
Starting from n=2, the forward step proves the inequality for every power of 2, and the backward step then proves it for every positive integer n.
Therefore,
nx1+x2+⋯+xn≥nx1x2⋯xn. 4. GM–HM
Apply AM–GM to the positive numbers
x11,x21,…,xn1. We obtain
nx11+x21+⋯+xn1≥nx1x2⋯xn1. Since both sides are positive, taking reciprocals reverses the inequality:
x11+x21+⋯+xn1n≤nx1x2⋯xn. Therefore,
nx1x2⋯xn≥x11+x21+⋯+xn1n. 5. HM–Min
Since
x1≤x2≤⋯≤xn, taking reciprocals gives
x11≥x21≥⋯≥xn1. In particular,
x11≥xi1 for every i. Therefore,
x11+x21+⋯+xn1≤x1n. Since both sides are positive, taking reciprocals reverses the inequality:
x11+x21+⋯+xn11≥nx1. Multiplying by n, we obtain
x11+x21+⋯+xn1n≥x1. Since x1=min{x1,x2,…,xn},
x11+x21+⋯+xn1n≥min{x1,x2,…,xn}. Equality in all five inequalities holds if and only if
x1=x2=⋯=xn.□